Advanced Placement (AP) European History Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the AP European History Exam. Study with engaging content, including flashcards and multiple choice questions, each offering insights and explanations. Ace your exam confidently!

Start Multiple Choice Practice Test
Start Flash Cards

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What did Michael Ferrer claim about King William in his defense?

  1. He was enforcing the old laws

  2. He came to maintain rights but sought the Crown instead

  3. He was acting in the best interest of the people

  4. He was a better ruler than King James

The correct answer is: He came to maintain rights but sought the Crown instead

Michael Ferrer claimed that King William came to maintain rights but sought the Crown instead. This assertion reflects the political context of the Glorious Revolution and the subsequent transition of power in England. William of Orange was invited to invade England to protect Protestantism and the rights of English subjects after the perceived tyranny of King James II. Ferrer’s defense suggests that William’s initial motivations were rooted in maintaining established rights rather than an outright ambition for the throne. This interpretation emphasizes the complexity of William's role in this transitional period, portraying him as a figure responding to broader concerns about governance and individual liberties rather than merely seeking personal power. This context is vital for understanding the political dynamics of that era and highlights the legitimacy issues surrounding monarchs during the period.

More Questions Like This